← All comparisons
Ring-flash-2.0 vs Claude 4.1 Opus (Non-reasoning)
InclusionAI vs Anthropic — side-by-side benchmark comparison
| Ring-flash-2.0 | Claude 4.1 Opus (Non-reasoning) | |
|---|---|---|
| Intelligence Index | 14.0 | 36.0 |
| Coding Index | 10.6 | — |
| Math Index | 83.7 | — |
| Output speed (tok/s) | 0.0 | 44.7 |
| Blended price ($/1M) | $0.25 | $32.81 |
| Time to first token (s) | 0.00s | 1.63s |
| aime | — | — |
| aime 25 | 83.7% | — |
| artificial analysis coding index | 10.60 | — |
| artificial analysis intelligence index | 14.00 | 36.00 |
| artificial analysis math index | 83.70 | — |
| gpqa | 72.5% | — |
| hle | 8.9% | — |
| ifbench | 43.3% | — |
| lcr | 21.0% | — |
| livecodebench | 62.8% | — |
| math 500 | — | — |
| mmlu pro | 79.3% | — |
| scicode | 16.8% | — |
| tau2 | 0.0% | — |
| terminalbench hard | 7.6% | — |
Benchmark data from Artificial Analysis.