← All comparisons
Mistral Medium 3.5 vs Ling-flash-2.0
Mistral vs InclusionAI — side-by-side benchmark comparison
| Mistral Medium 3.5 | Ling-flash-2.0 | |
|---|---|---|
| Intelligence Index | 39.2 | 15.7 |
| Coding Index | 35.4 | 16.7 |
| Math Index | — | 65.3 |
| Output speed (tok/s) | 169.9 | 81.3 |
| Blended price ($/1M) | $3.00 | $0.25 |
| Time to first token (s) | 0.52s | 1.59s |
| aime | — | — |
| aime 25 | — | 65.3% |
| artificial analysis coding index | 35.40 | 16.70 |
| artificial analysis intelligence index | 39.20 | 15.70 |
| artificial analysis math index | — | 65.30 |
| gpqa | 74.8% | 65.7% |
| hle | 12.8% | 6.3% |
| ifbench | 68.8% | 34.4% |
| lcr | 61.0% | 15.0% |
| livecodebench | — | 58.9% |
| math 500 | — | — |
| mmlu pro | — | 77.7% |
| scicode | 39.6% | 28.9% |
| tau2 | 94.2% | 20.8% |
| terminalbench hard | 33.3% | 10.6% |
Benchmark data from Artificial Analysis.