← All comparisons
Claude Sonnet 4.6 (Non-reasoning, Low Effort) vs GLM-4.6 (Reasoning)
Anthropic vs Z AI — side-by-side benchmark comparison
| Claude Sonnet 4.6 (Non-reasoning, Low Effort) | GLM-4.6 (Reasoning) | |
|---|---|---|
| Intelligence Index | 42.6 | 32.5 |
| Coding Index | 43.0 | 29.5 |
| Math Index | — | 86.0 |
| Output speed (tok/s) | 54.9 | 42.7 |
| Blended price ($/1M) | $6.56 | $0.96 |
| Time to first token (s) | 1.13s | 1.63s |
| aime | — | — |
| aime 25 | — | 86.0% |
| artificial analysis coding index | 43.00 | 29.50 |
| artificial analysis intelligence index | 42.60 | 32.50 |
| artificial analysis math index | — | 86.00 |
| gpqa | 79.7% | 78.0% |
| hle | 10.8% | 13.3% |
| ifbench | 42.4% | 43.4% |
| lcr | 58.7% | 54.3% |
| livecodebench | — | 69.5% |
| math 500 | — | — |
| mmlu pro | — | 82.9% |
| scicode | 44.1% | 38.4% |
| tau2 | 78.9% | 70.5% |
| terminalbench hard | 42.4% | 25.0% |
Benchmark data from Artificial Analysis.