← All comparisons
Claude Sonnet 4.6 (Non-reasoning, Low Effort) vs DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B
Anthropic vs DeepSeek — side-by-side benchmark comparison
| Claude Sonnet 4.6 (Non-reasoning, Low Effort) | DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B | |
|---|---|---|
| Intelligence Index | 42.6 | 9.1 |
| Coding Index | 43.0 | — |
| Math Index | — | 22.0 |
| Output speed (tok/s) | 54.9 | 0.0 |
| Blended price ($/1M) | $6.56 | $0.00 |
| Time to first token (s) | 1.13s | 0.00s |
| aime | — | 17.7% |
| aime 25 | — | 22.0% |
| artificial analysis coding index | 43.00 | — |
| artificial analysis intelligence index | 42.60 | 9.10 |
| artificial analysis math index | — | 22.00 |
| gpqa | 79.7% | 9.8% |
| hle | 10.8% | 3.3% |
| ifbench | 42.4% | 13.2% |
| lcr | 58.7% | 0.3% |
| livecodebench | — | 7.0% |
| math 500 | — | 68.7% |
| mmlu pro | — | 26.9% |
| scicode | 44.1% | 6.6% |
| tau2 | 78.9% | — |
| terminalbench hard | 42.4% | — |
Benchmark data from Artificial Analysis.