← All comparisons
Claude 4.1 Opus (Non-reasoning) vs GLM-4.6 (Non-reasoning)
Anthropic vs Z AI — side-by-side benchmark comparison
| Claude 4.1 Opus (Non-reasoning) | GLM-4.6 (Non-reasoning) | |
|---|---|---|
| Intelligence Index | 36.0 | 30.2 |
| Coding Index | — | 30.2 |
| Math Index | — | 44.3 |
| Output speed (tok/s) | 44.7 | 53.2 |
| Blended price ($/1M) | $32.81 | $1.00 |
| Time to first token (s) | 1.63s | 1.84s |
| aime | — | — |
| aime 25 | — | 44.3% |
| artificial analysis coding index | — | 30.20 |
| artificial analysis intelligence index | 36.00 | 30.20 |
| artificial analysis math index | — | 44.30 |
| gpqa | — | 63.2% |
| hle | — | 5.2% |
| ifbench | — | 36.7% |
| lcr | — | 26.3% |
| livecodebench | — | 56.1% |
| math 500 | — | — |
| mmlu pro | — | 78.4% |
| scicode | — | 33.1% |
| tau2 | — | 76.9% |
| terminalbench hard | — | 28.8% |
Benchmark data from Artificial Analysis.