← All comparisons
K-EXAONE (Non-reasoning) vs Claude 4.1 Opus (Non-reasoning)
LG AI Research vs Anthropic — side-by-side benchmark comparison
| K-EXAONE (Non-reasoning) | Claude 4.1 Opus (Non-reasoning) | |
|---|---|---|
| Intelligence Index | 23.4 | 36.0 |
| Coding Index | 13.5 | — |
| Math Index | 44.0 | — |
| Output speed (tok/s) | 0.0 | 44.7 |
| Blended price ($/1M) | $0.00 | $32.81 |
| Time to first token (s) | 0.00s | 1.63s |
| aime | — | — |
| aime 25 | 44.0% | — |
| artificial analysis coding index | 13.50 | — |
| artificial analysis intelligence index | 23.40 | 36.00 |
| artificial analysis math index | 44.00 | — |
| gpqa | 69.5% | — |
| hle | 5.4% | — |
| ifbench | 39.6% | — |
| lcr | 47.0% | — |
| livecodebench | — | — |
| math 500 | — | — |
| mmlu pro | 81.0% | — |
| scicode | 27.0% | — |
| tau2 | 59.1% | — |
| terminalbench hard | 6.8% | — |
Benchmark data from Artificial Analysis.