← All comparisons
Exaone 4.0 1.2B (Reasoning) vs Claude 4.1 Opus (Non-reasoning)
LG AI Research vs Anthropic — side-by-side benchmark comparison
| Exaone 4.0 1.2B (Reasoning) | Claude 4.1 Opus (Non-reasoning) | |
|---|---|---|
| Intelligence Index | 8.3 | 36.0 |
| Coding Index | 3.1 | — |
| Math Index | 50.3 | — |
| Output speed (tok/s) | 0.0 | 44.7 |
| Blended price ($/1M) | $0.00 | $32.81 |
| Time to first token (s) | 0.00s | 1.63s |
| aime | — | — |
| aime 25 | 50.3% | — |
| artificial analysis coding index | 3.10 | — |
| artificial analysis intelligence index | 8.30 | 36.00 |
| artificial analysis math index | 50.30 | — |
| gpqa | 51.5% | — |
| hle | 5.8% | — |
| ifbench | 23.0% | — |
| lcr | 0.0% | — |
| livecodebench | 51.6% | — |
| math 500 | — | — |
| mmlu pro | 58.8% | — |
| scicode | 9.3% | — |
| tau2 | 16.4% | — |
| terminalbench hard | 0.0% | — |
Benchmark data from Artificial Analysis.