← All comparisons
Ring-2.6-1T vs Claude 4.1 Opus (Non-reasoning)
InclusionAI vs Anthropic — side-by-side benchmark comparison
| Ring-2.6-1T | Claude 4.1 Opus (Non-reasoning) | |
|---|---|---|
| Intelligence Index | 38.5 | 36.0 |
| Coding Index | 33.3 | — |
| Math Index | — | — |
| Output speed (tok/s) | 127.7 | 44.7 |
| Blended price ($/1M) | $0.85 | $32.81 |
| Time to first token (s) | 1.89s | 1.63s |
| aime | — | — |
| aime 25 | — | — |
| artificial analysis coding index | 33.30 | — |
| artificial analysis intelligence index | 38.50 | 36.00 |
| artificial analysis math index | — | — |
| gpqa | 85.7% | — |
| hle | 18.3% | — |
| ifbench | 44.6% | — |
| lcr | 64.3% | — |
| livecodebench | — | — |
| math 500 | — | — |
| mmlu pro | — | — |
| scicode | 42.4% | — |
| tau2 | 92.4% | — |
| terminalbench hard | 28.8% | — |
Benchmark data from Artificial Analysis.