← All comparisons
Ling-mini-2.0 vs Claude 4.1 Opus (Non-reasoning)
InclusionAI vs Anthropic — side-by-side benchmark comparison
| Ling-mini-2.0 | Claude 4.1 Opus (Non-reasoning) | |
|---|---|---|
| Intelligence Index | 9.2 | 36.0 |
| Coding Index | 5.0 | — |
| Math Index | 49.3 | — |
| Output speed (tok/s) | 0.0 | 44.7 |
| Blended price ($/1M) | $0.00 | $32.81 |
| Time to first token (s) | 0.00s | 1.63s |
| aime | — | — |
| aime 25 | 49.3% | — |
| artificial analysis coding index | 5.00 | — |
| artificial analysis intelligence index | 9.20 | 36.00 |
| artificial analysis math index | 49.30 | — |
| gpqa | 56.2% | — |
| hle | 5.0% | — |
| ifbench | 23.6% | — |
| lcr | 6.7% | — |
| livecodebench | 42.9% | — |
| math 500 | — | — |
| mmlu pro | 67.1% | — |
| scicode | 13.5% | — |
| tau2 | 13.2% | — |
| terminalbench hard | 0.8% | — |
Benchmark data from Artificial Analysis.