← All comparisons
Gemma 3n E2B Instruct vs Claude 4.1 Opus (Non-reasoning)
Google vs Anthropic — side-by-side benchmark comparison
| Gemma 3n E2B Instruct | Claude 4.1 Opus (Non-reasoning) | |
|---|---|---|
| Intelligence Index | 4.8 | 36.0 |
| Coding Index | 2.2 | — |
| Math Index | 10.3 | — |
| Output speed (tok/s) | 0.0 | 44.7 |
| Blended price ($/1M) | $0.00 | $32.81 |
| Time to first token (s) | 0.00s | 1.63s |
| aime | 9.0% | — |
| aime 25 | 10.3% | — |
| artificial analysis coding index | 2.20 | — |
| artificial analysis intelligence index | 4.80 | 36.00 |
| artificial analysis math index | 10.30 | — |
| gpqa | 22.9% | — |
| hle | 4.0% | — |
| ifbench | 22.0% | — |
| lcr | 0.0% | — |
| livecodebench | 9.5% | — |
| math 500 | 69.1% | — |
| mmlu pro | 37.8% | — |
| scicode | 5.2% | — |
| tau2 | 0.0% | — |
| terminalbench hard | 0.8% | — |
Benchmark data from Artificial Analysis.