← All comparisons
K-EXAONE (Non-reasoning) vs Claude 4.1 Opus (Reasoning)
LG AI Research vs Anthropic — side-by-side benchmark comparison
| K-EXAONE (Non-reasoning) | Claude 4.1 Opus (Reasoning) | |
|---|---|---|
| Intelligence Index | 23.4 | 42.0 |
| Coding Index | 13.5 | 36.5 |
| Math Index | 44.0 | 80.3 |
| Output speed (tok/s) | 0.0 | 44.5 |
| Blended price ($/1M) | $0.00 | $32.81 |
| Time to first token (s) | 0.00s | 8.55s |
| aime | — | — |
| aime 25 | 44.0% | 80.3% |
| artificial analysis coding index | 13.50 | 36.50 |
| artificial analysis intelligence index | 23.40 | 42.00 |
| artificial analysis math index | 44.00 | 80.30 |
| gpqa | 69.5% | 80.9% |
| hle | 5.4% | 11.9% |
| ifbench | 39.6% | 55.4% |
| lcr | 47.0% | 66.3% |
| livecodebench | — | 65.4% |
| math 500 | — | — |
| mmlu pro | 81.0% | 88.0% |
| scicode | 27.0% | 40.9% |
| tau2 | 59.1% | 71.4% |
| terminalbench hard | 6.8% | 34.3% |
Benchmark data from Artificial Analysis.