← All comparisons
Exaone 4.0 1.2B (Non-reasoning) vs Claude 4.1 Opus (Reasoning)
LG AI Research vs Anthropic — side-by-side benchmark comparison
| Exaone 4.0 1.2B (Non-reasoning) | Claude 4.1 Opus (Reasoning) | |
|---|---|---|
| Intelligence Index | 8.1 | 42.0 |
| Coding Index | 2.5 | 36.5 |
| Math Index | 24.0 | 80.3 |
| Output speed (tok/s) | 0.0 | 44.5 |
| Blended price ($/1M) | $0.00 | $32.81 |
| Time to first token (s) | 0.00s | 8.55s |
| aime | — | — |
| aime 25 | 24.0% | 80.3% |
| artificial analysis coding index | 2.50 | 36.50 |
| artificial analysis intelligence index | 8.10 | 42.00 |
| artificial analysis math index | 24.00 | 80.30 |
| gpqa | 42.4% | 80.9% |
| hle | 5.8% | 11.9% |
| ifbench | 25.3% | 55.4% |
| lcr | 0.0% | 66.3% |
| livecodebench | 29.3% | 65.4% |
| math 500 | — | — |
| mmlu pro | 50.0% | 88.0% |
| scicode | 7.4% | 40.9% |
| tau2 | 20.5% | 71.4% |
| terminalbench hard | 0.0% | 34.3% |
Benchmark data from Artificial Analysis.