← All comparisons
Ling-mini-2.0 vs Claude 4.1 Opus (Reasoning)
InclusionAI vs Anthropic — side-by-side benchmark comparison
| Ling-mini-2.0 | Claude 4.1 Opus (Reasoning) | |
|---|---|---|
| Intelligence Index | 9.2 | 42.0 |
| Coding Index | 5.0 | 36.5 |
| Math Index | 49.3 | 80.3 |
| Output speed (tok/s) | 0.0 | 44.5 |
| Blended price ($/1M) | $0.00 | $32.81 |
| Time to first token (s) | 0.00s | 8.55s |
| aime | — | — |
| aime 25 | 49.3% | 80.3% |
| artificial analysis coding index | 5.00 | 36.50 |
| artificial analysis intelligence index | 9.20 | 42.00 |
| artificial analysis math index | 49.30 | 80.30 |
| gpqa | 56.2% | 80.9% |
| hle | 5.0% | 11.9% |
| ifbench | 23.6% | 55.4% |
| lcr | 6.7% | 66.3% |
| livecodebench | 42.9% | 65.4% |
| math 500 | — | — |
| mmlu pro | 67.1% | 88.0% |
| scicode | 13.5% | 40.9% |
| tau2 | 13.2% | 71.4% |
| terminalbench hard | 0.8% | 34.3% |
Benchmark data from Artificial Analysis.