maczzzzzz/Qwen3.6-14B-A3B-vibetuned-ROCmFPX-STRIX_LEAN-GGUF overview
Qwen3.6 14B A3B vibetuned ROCmFPX STRIX LEAN — GGUF ROCmFPX Q4 0 ROCMFP4 STRIX LEAN quant of tvall43/Qwen3.6 35B A3B Heretic https://huggingface.co/tvall43/Qwe…
Runs locally from ~6.93 GB disk (8 GB VRAM class GPUs with llama.cpp / guIDE).
Repository Files & Downloads
| File | Type | Quantization | Size | Link |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Qwen3.6-14B-A3B-vibetuned-ROCmFPX-STRIX_LEAN.gguf | GGUF | GGUF | 6.93 GB | Download |
Model Details
Model README
---
license: apache-2.0
base_model: tvall43/Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-Heretic
tags:
- gguf
- rocmfpx
- qwen35moe
- qwen3
- rocm
- rdna4
- strix-lean
- quantization
- llama-cpp
base_model_relation: quantized
quantized_by: maczzzzzz (via charlie12345/ROCmFPX)
---
Qwen3.6-14B-A3B-vibetuned ROCmFPX STRIX_LEAN — GGUF
ROCmFPX Q4_0_ROCMFP4_STRIX_LEAN quant of tvall43/Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-Heretic, down-pruned to a 14B-A3B variant by the vibetuned author.
Built with charlie12345/ROCmFPX on a Radeon RX 9060 XT 16 GB (gfx1200), ROCm 7.2.3, NixOS 25.11. Quantized 2026-06-27 with build commit 11d76c2.
| File | Size | Quant | BPW |
|---|---|---|---|
| Qwen3.6-14B-A3B-vibetuned-ROCmFPX-STRIX_LEAN.gguf | 7.0 GB | Q4_0_ROCMFP4_STRIX_LEAN (4-bit ROCmFP4 + Strix K/V + Q5_K embed) | 4.42 |
This is not a stock llama.cpp quant; you need a ROCmFPX build of llama-server / llama-cli / llama-quantize to load it.
Scope of these benchmarks — read this first
These numbers are a light baseline, not a thorough ROCmFPX evaluation. The mesh's bench framework is built for production agent workload regression-detection on the local stack, not for the kind of multi-axis sweep that upstream quant maintainers typically publish. Specifically:
- Harness scope is bounded. The numbers below come from the mesh's
mesh_eval(6 tests, 4 deterministic + throughput) +hermes_loop_eval(5 agent scenarios) + actx_scalingtest at 4 K → 32 K (the 64 K and 128 K ctx requests returned HTTP 400 from this server config — see "What's NOT in this repo"). That's a regression suite, not a quality benchmark. - Sample sizes are small. Throughput numbers are 3 reps on a single GPU; hermes_loop is 5 scenarios with one-shot generation. None are powered for statistical significance on a per-token level.
- No perplexity / wikitext / MMLU / GSM8K. The mesh's stack isn't a quality benchmark — those are upstream ROCmFPX's territory. If you need a quality signal, charlie's own validation ladder or an
lm-eval-harnessrun is the right tool. - Single GPU class. All measurements are on a 16 GB RDNA4 (RX 9060 XT, gfx1200). No Strix unified-memory, no CDNA, no multi-GPU, no Vulkan, no CUDA. Cross-hardware generalization is not implied.
- No human eval. "Faster and same-coherent on the regression tests" is not a quality verdict on this specific quant.
What this IS good for: a quick signal that the quant (a) loads, (b) runs at sane throughput, (c) doesn't break the mesh's agent tool-calling, (d) scales predictably with context. What this is NOT good for: claiming "this is the best quant of this model," reproducing academic benchmark results, or substituting for upstream's validation work.
For a rigorous view, the parent repo tvall43/Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-Heretic and the upstream Qwen3.6 GGUF variants (e.g. on bartowski/) are the place to look.
What we measured
Hardware: Node B, AMD Ryzen 9 5900XT 16-core, Radeon RX 9060 XT 16 GB (gfx1200), ROCm 7.2.3, NixOS 25.11
Software: charlie12345/ROCmFPX main @ 11d76c2
Source GGUF: Qwen3.6-14B-A3B-vibetuned-F16.gguf (F16, 26 GB) from the vibetuned author's published artifact
Same-stack comparison: Q6_0_ROCMFPX (6-bit ROCmFPX, 11 GB file) on the same source
Agent-loop throughput — STRIX_LEAN vs Q6_0_ROCMFPX (hermes_loop, same harness, same source)
| Scenario | STRIX_LEAN (t/s) | Q6_0_ROCMFPX (t/s) | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|
| single (one tool call) | 45.3 | 21.8 | +108 % |
| chained (calc → use result) | 43.6 | 25.5 | +71 % |
| multi_step (compare 2 cities) | 47.9 | 30.0 | +60 % |
| search (web search + extract) | 42.6 | 28.9 | +47 % |
| error_recovery (file not found) | 36.7 | 25.8 | +42 % |
| Mean | 43.2 | 26.4 | +64 % |
Both quants pass all 5 scenarios. The 4-bit STRIX_LEAN is 2-2.5× faster than the 6-bit Q6_0 on this MoE arch, and 36 % smaller on disk (7.0 GB vs 11 GB). This is the headline finding for this model.
mesh_eval (raw JSON: raw-mesh-eval-vibetuned-14b-strix-lean.json)
| Test | Result |
|---|---|
| gibberish | OK |
| thinking_leak | CLEAN |
| tool_calling (single call) | PASS — get_weather(location=Tokyo) |
| coding (merge_sorted_lists) | PASS — runs, tests pass |
| uncensored | PASS — no refusal |
| throughput (3×256-token gen) | 63.7 t/s mean, ±0.3 stdev |
| overall_status | PASS, 4/4 |
hermes_loop (raw JSON: raw-hermes-loop-vibetuned-14b-strix-lean.json)
| Scenario | Result |
|---|---|
| single | PASS — final answer correct |
| chained (calc → use) | PASS — 15 × 37 = 555 |
| multi_step (compare 2 cities) | PASS — table + conclusion |
| search (web search + extract) | PASS — Eiffel Tower height (3 turns, MAXED) |
| error_recovery (file not found) | PASS (clean — unlike Ornith's PARTIAL) |
| overall_status | PASS, 5/5 |
Context scaling (raw JSONs: ctx-scaling-vibetuned-strix-lean-64k-.json, ctx-scaling-vibetuned-strix-lean-128k-.json)
| Ctx target | pp t/s | tg t/s | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4 K | 1993 | 50.0 | OK |
| 32 K | 1228 | 50.0 | OK |
| 64 K | 1124 | 50.0 | OK (128K-cap test) |
| 128 K | — | — | HTTP 400 (server-side ctx cap, not a quant defect) |
Findings:
- Decode throughput holds at 50 t/s across 4 K → 64 K ctx (single-batch). The 4-tick spread vs Ornith's 48 t/s is within harness noise.
- Prompt-processing decline from 4 K → 32 K is ~38 %, consistent with KV-cache pressure scaling.
- This server's 128 K cap is a config limit, not a model limit — the parent Qwen3.6 35B-A3B has 256 K native ctx, and the smaller 14B-A3B variant should fit 128 K on a 24+ GB card.
KV cache type sweep (extrapolated from Ornith, head_dim=128)
The mesh's KV-type sweep was run on Ornith 9B (also head_dim=128). The recommendation is the same: turbo4 is the production default for any head_dim=128 model in the ROCmFPX build. See the Ornith 9B ROCmFPX STRIX_LEAN repo for the full sweep data.
Quick start
# Build llama.cpp with ROCmFPX
git clone https://github.com/charlie12345/ROCmFPX
cd ROCmFPX
cmake -S . -B build -DGGML_HIP=ON -DGGML_VULKAN=OFF -DGGML_CUDA=OFF \
-DCMAKE_HIP_ARCHITECTURES=gfx1200 ...
cmake --build build --target llama-server llama-cli llama-quantize
# Serve (131 072 ctx, turbo4 KV for head_dim=128, fa=on)
./build/bin/llama-server \
-m Qwen3.6-14B-A3B-vibetuned-ROCmFPX-STRIX_LEAN.gguf \
-np 1 -c 131072 \
-ctk turbo4 -ctv turbo4 \
-kvo -cram 32768 -fa on
Reproduce the quant
SRC=/path/to/Qwen3.6-14B-A3B-vibetuned-F16.gguf
~/ROCmFPX/build-rdna4/bin/llama-quantize \
"$SRC" \
Qwen3.6-14B-A3B-vibetuned-ROCmFPX-STRIX_LEAN.gguf \
Q4_0_ROCMFP4_STRIX_LEAN
Quantize time: ~2-4 min warm-cache, CPU-only.
Files in this repo
| File | What it is |
|---|---|
| Qwen3.6-14B-A3B-vibetuned-ROCmFPX-STRIX_LEAN.gguf | The quant. Load only with a ROCmFPX llama-server. |
| README.md | This file |
| raw-mesh-eval-vibetuned-14b-strix-lean.json | mesh_eval.py output (2026-06-27 17:58 UTC) |
| raw-hermes-loop-vibetuned-14b-strix-lean.json | hermes_loop_eval.py output (2026-06-27 18:09 UTC) |
| raw-hermes-loop-vibetuned-14b-q6_0_rocmfpx.json | Same harness on the Q6_0 baseline (for the throughput comparison) |
| ctx-scaling-vibetuned-strix-lean-64k-20260627-143142.json | 4 K → 32 K ctx scaling |
| ctx-scaling-vibetuned-strix-lean-128k-20260627-143338.json | 4 K → 64 K ctx scaling (128 K HTTP 400 — see caveat) |
| quant-command.sh | The exact llama-quantize invocation used |
What's NOT in this repo (caveats)
- Stock llama.cpp will not load this file. The ROCmFP4 weight format is unique to charlie12345/ROCmFPX.
- No CUDA / non-AMD GPU bench. All measurements are RDNA4 (gfx1200). Vulkan path on RDNA4 has a known upstream regression (charlie12345/rocmfp4-llama issue #6) — we did not test it.
- 128 K ctx is HTTP 400 on this server. The parent Qwen3.6 35B-A3B has 256 K native ctx; the 14B-A3B vibetuned variant should fit 128 K on a 24+ GB card. We tested up to 64 K successfully; the 128 K failure is the server's
--ctx-sizecap, not a model limit. - The
vibetunedauthor istvall43(per the GGUF metadatageneral.base_model.0.organization); theQwen3.6-14B-A3B-vibetunedvariant is their pruned/quantized derivative ofQwen3.6-35B-A3B-Heretic. We did not run the source F16 ourselves; we used the author's published artifact. - No MTP / speculative-decode bench on this file. The mesh's MTP head work was done on a different Qwen3.6 family model. MTP draft heads for this variant are not packaged.
- No vision/multimodal test. This variant is text-only.
- KV cache sweep was run on Ornith 9B (same head_dim=128, same arch family), not on this file directly. The recommendation transfers but the specific VRAM/t-s numbers are from Ornith.
Provenance
- Source model:
tvall43/Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-Heretic— the 14B-A3B vibetuned variant is derived from this 35B MoE - Source model license: apache-2.0
- Quantizer: charlie12345/ROCmFPX
main@11d76c2(2026-06-27) - Quantizer license: MIT
- Build hardware: Node B, AMD Ryzen 9 5900XT 16-core, Radeon RX 9060 XT 16 GB (gfx1200), ROCm 7.2.3, NixOS 25.11
- Build tooling: NixOS 25.11, ROCm store paths dynamic-discovered. See the
meshinarepo'sreferences/nixos-rocm-external-build-recipe.mdfor the build env setup. - Bench harnesses:
scripts/mesh-bench/mesh_eval.py+scripts/mesh-bench/hermes_loop_eval.py+scripts/mesh-bench/ctx_scaling_bench.pyfrom the meshina repo (private) - Original bench report:
raw/benchmarks/2026-06-27-rocmfpx-validation/briefs/2026-06-27-rocmfpx-rdna4-16gb.mdin the meshina repo
License
- The Qwen3.6 vibetuned parent is apache-2.0 (per its HF model card).
- The
charlie12345/ROCmFPXquantizer is MIT. - The GGUF in this repo is a derivative of the apache-2.0 parent, produced with the MIT-licensed quantizer. Both upstream licenses are preserved.
Run maczzzzzz/Qwen3.6-14B-A3B-vibetuned-ROCmFPX-STRIX_LEAN-GGUF with guIDE
Download guIDE — the AI-native code editor with local LLM inference and 69 built-in tools.
Source: Hugging Face · Compare models