bidubr/repente-v0.7-GGUF overview
Repente v0.7 A language model that writes Pure Data patches and SuperCollider code, and runs locally. Qwen2.5 Coder 7B Instruct fine tuned with QLoRA, exported…
Runs locally from ~4.36 GB disk (8 GB VRAM class GPUs with llama.cpp / guIDE).
Repository Files & Downloads
| File | Type | Quantization | Size | Link |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| repente-v0.7-Q4_K_M.gguf | GGUF | Q4_K_M | 4.36 GB | Download |
Model Details
| Model ID | bidubr/repente-v0.7-GGUF |
|---|---|
| Author | bidubr |
| Pipeline | text-generation |
| License | apache-2.0 |
| Base model | Qwen/Qwen2.5-Coder-7B-Instruct |
| Last modified | 2026-08-19T23:18:25.000Z |
Model README
---
license: apache-2.0
base_model: Qwen/Qwen2.5-Coder-7B-Instruct
base_model_relation: finetune
pipeline_tag: text-generation
language:
- en
tags:
- gguf
- pure-data
- supercollider
- computer-music
- code-generation
- qlora
- llama-cpp
---
Repente v0.7
A language model that writes Pure Data patches and SuperCollider code, and runs
locally. Qwen2.5-Coder-7B-Instruct fine-tuned with QLoRA, exported to GGUF at
Q4_K_M.
This is the current release. A companion repository,
bidubr/repente-v0.5-GGUF, holds the
earlier v0.5, kept available because the experiments in the paper were run on it.
What it does
Give it a description of a sound and it writes the code that produces it. Ask it about
an existing patch and it explains the signal flow.
make a sine wave at 440 Hz connected to output
#N canvas 0 0 450 300 12;
#X obj 100 100 osc~ 440;
#X obj 100 150 dac~;
#X connect 0 0 1 0;
#X connect 0 0 1 1;
That is a Pure Data file. Save it, open it, and it makes a sound.
How good it is, measured
Five Pure Data generation prompts, each sampled 30 times at temperature 0.7, scored by
whether the output carries a canvas header, an output object, and connections.
| Model | Expected score out of 5 | 95% interval |
|---|---|---|
| Qwen2.5-Coder-7B, unmodified | 0.03 | [0.00, 0.10] |
| Repente v0.5 | 2.67 | [2.37, 2.97] |
| Repente v0.7 | 3.83 | [3.53, 4.13] |
The base model emits a valid canvas header in 2.7% of attempts, yet names an output
object in 68.7% of them, more often than v0.5 does. Its deficit is serialization, not
intent, and that is the gap fine-tuning closes.
Version 0.7 is the strongest of the nine checkpoints trained, and is the only one the
battery separates from v0.5 by disjoint intervals. Full protocol in Appendix C of the
paper.
Running it
With Ollama, straight from this repository:
ollama run hf.co/bidubr/repente-v0.7-GGUF:Q4_K_M
With llama.cpp:
llama-server -m repente-v0.7-Q4_K_M.gguf -ngl 99 -c 4096
4.5 GB on disk. Fits in 8 GB of VRAM with room for a 4096-token context.
Prompting
The system prompt used throughout the reported experiments is short:
You are Repente, a musical programming expert.
Format validity improves substantially when three worked examples and a short
chain-of-thought instruction are supplied together. Measured on frozen weights, the
combination raises format validity from 75% to 100% across four prompt difficulty
levels and eliminates output truncation, at no compute cost. Few-shot exemplars
supplied alone introduce a context-leak failure mode in which the model continues the
turn structure of the examples until the token limit; the reasoning instruction
suppresses it. Details in Section 8 of the paper.
Known limitations
ELSE objects are not generated. Across 1,350 measured generations, an object from
the ELSE library appears once. Five cycles of corpus weighting, including one that
weighted ELSE explicitly, did not change this. Treat library coverage as a retrieval
problem at inference time, not something the weights will supply.
Analysis responses are short. The unmodified base model produces analyses averaging
776 tokens; this model produces 151. The compression is a self-distillation artifact of
using each version's own output to train the next, and it is documented rather than
fixed.
Patch validity is not patch quality. The measurements above score a generation as
passing when it carries a canvas header, an output object, and connections. That is
necessary for a patch to make sound and not sufficient for it to make the right sound.
Related
- Paper: [arXiv:[ARXIV_ID]](https://arxiv.org/abs/[ARXIV_ID])
- Code, data and measurement protocol: https://repente.net
- pd-repente: a PlugData fork with a prompt bar in the patching window,
https://github.com/dobidu/plugdata
Citation
@misc{repente2026,
author = {Batista, Carlos Eduardo Coelho Freire},
title = {Repente: A Specialized LLM for Musical Programming Languages
with SonicUnit Knowledge Architecture},
year = {2026},
eprint = {[ARXIV_ID]},
archivePrefix= {arXiv},
primaryClass = {cs.SD}
}
Licensed Apache 2.0, inherited from the base model.
Run bidubr/repente-v0.7-GGUF with guIDE
Download guIDE — the AI-native code editor with local LLM inference and 69 built-in tools.
Source: Hugging Face · Compare models